Science, by definition, has to be observable, testable, AND repeatable. You cannot observe evolution, test evolution, or repeat an evolutionary experiment. And please don't tell me about the bird beaks getting longer, or bacteria becoming resistant..these are NOT evolution. They are adaptation and natural selection. Dogs always give birth to dogs and apple trees always produce apples.

Mutations are always neutral or negative (Don't bring up cells, it's always with a trade-off).
See the failed fruit fly experiment for proof of this:
http://www.pathlights.com/ce_encyclopedia/Encyclopedia/10mut10.htm#Mutation%20Research%20Project

And please show me a picture of a fossil that isn't already fully formed.
Scientists only use presupposition and imagination to come up with evolution 'evidence.' Stop believing someone just because they're a scientist.

Evolution unraveled by non-creationist.
http://www.kathymcmahon.utvinternet.com/mrn/audio/InsideTrackNews040921.zip

NO.
jtm

I have never heard anything so ridiculous in my life.

Geology shows that fossils are of different ages.

Paleontology shows a fossil sequence, the list of species represents changes through time.

Taxonomy shows biological relationships among species.

Evolution is the explanation that threads it all together.

Creationism is the practice of squeezing one's eyes shut and wailing, "Does not!"